Sunday, August 12, 2012

“Carry on my wayward son, there’ll be peace when you are done”



Pentecost 11
August 12, 2012
2 Samuel 18:5-9, 15, 31-33


It’s a pretty well-known story, the tale of the prodigal son.  In the Gospel of Luke, it is a story about a son who thought that he knew better than his father, so he set off on his own with his share of the inheritance and eventually comes to his sense while sitting in a pig stall getting ready to fight the pigs for their food. 
The story of Absalom and David found in 2 Samuel is not that story of the prodigal son.  I hesitate to even call Absalom prodigal…wayward probably works a lot better.
Here’s what the lectionary has caused us to miss:  Shortly after the power play that David pulled to take Bathsheba as his own, which resulted in her husband Uriah’s death, David’s oldest son, Amnon, raped David’s daughter, Tamar.  David was furious with Amnon for what he had done, but we are never told that David took any action to punish his son for what he had done.  Infuriated by the incident and David’s lack of action, David’s third son, Absalom, took matters into his own hands and killed Amnon two years later on an evening when Amnon had had a little too much to drink.  After killing his brother, Absalom fled from Jerusalem and remained away for three years, during which time David began to yearn for him.  Upon Absalom’s return, David forgives him…but Absalom wasn’t quite done with his mischief making just yet.  Absalom returned to Jerusalem with a plan to take over for his father, and he worked for four years to usurp his father’s throne.  Eventually, he was successful, being crowned King at Hebron and forcing David to flee Jerusalem to preserve his own life.  Then, as a visible sign to the people that Absalom was now in charge of things, Absalom made it a regular practice of laying with David’s concubines in public. 
Sounds like a really great kid, doesn’t he? The son that every man dreams of having one day, right?  Not so much….
After Absalom usurped the throne, David sent one of his trusted friends into serve on Absalom’s court and spy on him, but otherwise, David took a pretty passive stance on the whole thing, trusting that the Lord would take care of him in the future, regardless of whether he was on the throne or not. Eventually, however, David does muster an army together to go in and take back David’s place on the throne…and this is where our reading from this morning comes in.  David’s army has requested that for his safety, David not be allowed to go into battle.  They reasoned that if people didn’t know who they were and things didn’t go according to plan, they could slip out easier than if David was with them.  David agrees to this, but makes one plea in the presence of his men…and that was to deal gently with his son Absalom.  That’s his only request before sending the troops to battle.
It’s a very interesting request that David makes…for the troops to deal gently with his son.  A son who killed his brother, usurped his father’s throne and attempted to murder his father in the process, slept with his father’s concubines and did everything he could to make a mockery out of his father to prove that he was the one in charge now.  Absalom had not only become a political and military enemy, he had become a threat to David’s very life.  And yet, in this moment of preparation before battle, David chose to be a father before he was a king and to request that the life of his son be spared. 
As a person who is not a parent of a human child, I don’t know that I get it 100%. I know that throughout my entire life I have been reminded by my own parents time and time again that there could never be a reason for them to stop loving me.  But I also am aware of family situations where parent/child relationships have been broken and estranged for reasons that are nowhere near as severe as throne usurping, attempted murder…even though the betrayal felt in those broken relationships may feel that severe in the moment, or even years down the road.
So, in the aftermath of the great betrayal and rebellion of Absalom, I see vast amounts of grace in David’s request that his son be treated gently by David’s army.  But as it turns out, it was the forest that first dealt harshly with Absalom, followed by David’s disobedient men.  Joab disobeys David’s orders and has Absalom killed after finding him stuck in a tree by his hair, and when David is informed of this by the second runner, we see in the end of our text not the joy of a king whose enemy has been vanquished, but the grief of a father who loved his son dearly and without condition.  David was not a perfect man, he was actually a bigger scoundrel than we call him on.  There were times in his life, especially after the incident with Bathsheba where David was anything but a man after God’s heart…but here we see a man who gets it, who put down his crown to cry out in lament for his son.     
But there is also a glimpse of something bigger, as if the story of David and Absalom were to serve as a parable for readers of the Hebrew Scriptures in the same way the parable of the prodigal son reached Gospel readers.  I see in the story of David and Absalom, a representation of the story of God and God’s people. 
All throughout scripture and beyond, we have seen a relationship between God and God’s people that has been rocky, to say the least.  Time after time we have rebelled against God and betrayed God. 
We have fought ill-gotten religious wars in God’s name,
We have murdered our brothers and sisters and treated others like they were less than human,
We have replaced our heavenly father by placing our trust in money, in our jobs, and in ourselves,
We are fighting a culture war brandishing weapons of fried chicken sandwiches and waffle fries while 1 in 5 children in this nation go to bed hungry at night. 
Over and over we have done things as acts of rebellion against our heavenly father that we never should have done and have caused great damage to our relationship with our creator.  And the great irony of the whole thing is that in the midst of the great amounts of pain that we humans have caused each other and our heavenly father throughout the years, God’s love and faithfulness remain steady and unwavering.  Despite all the ways that we have been God’s wayward children, God’s love for us has been so deep…God’s desire for us to be protected from all the wrongs in the world so great, that God took a huge barrier out of our way by sending Jesus to come among us, show us the love of God in the most tangible of ways, cause some holy trouble by eating with the so called “wrong” people, and went to the cross so through that act we could be freed from our sin to have the boldness and confidence to call out to our heavenly parent and know that we will be heard. 
David was an imperfect man with a rebellious son, but in a story of a father’s love for his wayward son, we see God’s love for us, God’s wayward children and a faithfulness that is unwavering. 
So, carry on God’s wayward daughters and sons, there’ll be peace when we are done, lay your weary heads to rest, don’t you cry no more. Amen 

Thursday, August 2, 2012

Thankful Thursday - rainy day edition

Yes, that's right, it's a rainy day!!!

At 4:00am I awoke to a loud clap of thunder.  Normally this would bug me, but I was so excited for rain that I was thankful to the thunder for letting me know rain was on its way.

Today I am thankful for:
- Rain
- Thunder and lightning
- The National Youth Gathering
- An opportunity to visit family
- Great conversations with congregation members
- Earl Grey tea
- Gluten free labels at the grocery store
- The freedom to have an opinion and to share that opinion with someone else with out either of us saying "you're wrong"
- Grace
- County and local fairs
- Community

God is Good all the time!
All the time God is good! Amen

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

An Open Letter to Dan Cathy

Dear Mr. Cathy,

I have struggled for the last week to discern my feelings on the fiasco that has surrounded your company in the past weeks.  I would like to share some of these thoughts with you.

I approach this from the perspective of a Lutheran minister.  As such I view scripture as a living document through which the Holy Spirit breathes the Gospel into the world through both the narratives of the Old Testament and the witness of Jesus Christ and the early church.  I take the witness of the Gospel and it's message of grace, justice, and mercy very seriously.  It is this witness that has informed my outlook.  With this in mind, I want you to know that I respect your views and your right to free speech in regards to those views on marriage.  I do not agree with you, but I respect your opinion.

My reading of scripture has presented me with a variety of different definitions of marriage, from Mary and Joseph; to Abraham, Sarah, and Hagar; to Jacob and his wives and concubines; to Solomon and his 700 wives (yikes!).   There is no black and white definition of marriage in scripture, though I do understand the argument citing Jesus' quotation of Genesis 2 where it is written that a man shall leave his family and cling to his wife as being a basis for a definition of marriage.  So I get it if you do not agree with me on this issue. That's is ok. The world would be a boring place if we all agreed on everything.

Here is where the rub comes in - While I respect your opinion, I am very uncomfortable with the fact that some of the money that I have spent on food at chick-fil-a has been used to support organizations that promote discrimination and hate.  I am also uncomfortable with the fact that you wish to speak on behalf of God and, in essence put yourself in the judgment seat. We hear too much of this negative and hateful talk from  folks. My reading of scripture, specifically my reading of the witness of Jesus Christ in the Gospels does not fit in with a reading of scripture that shows a God ready to tear us limb from limb because we choose to love and show mercy to all people regardless of who they are.  The God I have read about in scripture is one who is slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love, who calls us to do justice, love mercy, and walk humbly with God.  Jesus Christ routinely ate with the outcast, the poor, and the so-called "unclean," much to the chagrin of those who thought they knew who was "in" and who was "out." In fact, it was because of this that Jesus went to the cross.  As Christians, we are called to follow in the steps of Christ, to love our neighbors as God in Christ first loved us.  In my understanding, that means being people of grace and love to seek justice and equality for our neighbors just as Christ sought equality for those that his society deemed to be unworthy.

In essence, Mr. Cathy, I support your right to your own opinion and your right to free speech, but I do not support your actions on behalf of the chick-fil-a name.  My reading of scripture speaks of a God who broke down barriers and, through the death and resurrection of Christ destroyed the walls that separate us, making us to be one body to be the hands and feet of God in the world.  As Christians, we do work against the work of Christ when we support hate and inequality.  So, it not because of your opinion on what defines marriage, but rather your actions on behalf of chick-fil-a which support the building up of walls that divide that has moved me to decide that I cannot in good conscience continue to be a patron of your chain of restaurants.

In God's peace,
Pastor Jen Kiefer